House (1977) Review
Author's Note: Originally written June 2nd, 2020. Wanted to write some really long form thing about this movie, and just showing that it's way more than how people present it like a "random movie" - connecting it to childhood fears and so forth. Probably one of the pieces I'm most proud of, but there are definitely with structural issues with this review, as well as a slight verbosity to it.
House centres around a schoolgirl named Oshare or Gorgeous/Angel who decides to spend her summer vacation down at her aunt’s house with six of her classmates, who lives alone after her husband was killed during World War II. But, as it turns out that the house is haunted and their aunt subsequently disappears like a ghostly apparition, and it turns out that the house is actually out to physically consume each of the girls until none of them are left – so the girls try to find a way to escape the house, and find an explanation for all of the bizarre occurrences that are happening all around them.
I think this
is definitely one of those movies that would appear nonsensical without any
sort of context – but the recurring themes in this movie are that of childhood
nostalgia, longing, trauma and regret – where there’s quite a lot of explicit
references towards World War II and the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings – and
the central premise of the movie is that the aunt’s husband died after having
his plane shot down during the second World War. But the whole movie is
concocted so that it feels like a very visceral and vivid nightmare that would
come straight out of a child’s imagination – and one of the credited writers on
the film was Chigumi Obayashi who was the then 10-year-old daughter of Nobuhiko
Obayashi. A lot of the teenaged girls in this movie are oddly infantilised, and
oddly constricted to central roles – to the point where the girls’ names are
just references towards their central roles like Sweet, Fantasy, Prof and Kung
Fu, and each of them seems to have a central gimmick which they seem to rely
upon over and over again – especially with the character of Kung Fu who is an
expert in aerobics and fighting.
The visual
design of the movie is within another league of its own – where so much of it
feels bizarre and just seems to through basically everything at it, and I
especially loved all of the beautiful matte paintings and all of the gorgeous
set-design – where everything about the visuals are incredibly sharp and
colourful, and it’s incredibly inventive with so much of it – where it has the
general tone that pretty much anything could happen to these girls, and I mean
that in the utmost sense – and yet we’re drawn into it just entirely down to
how great the movie looks, with all of the inventive camera-work and the
strange off the wall sequences – where it seems to just switch tones on a whim.
It’s genuinely good to look and there’s a lot about this movie that seems to
look like a bizarre painting – especially with the lighting which seems to just
saturate every single scene with rich primary colours, and there’s an element
to it where it looks a bit fake with all of the scenes where objects have
obviously been cut out with the lines surrounding them – but then we just
totally accept it all because of the surrealist atmosphere.
Although, the
shear inventiveness of the camera-work is amazing – particularly with how
there’s so many simple but effective shots in the movie, such as with the
overhead shot where the girls are first introduced into the mansion – and
there’s just a lot of space and shadows surrounding them as the girls are
brightly lit. And there’s a number of other select shots that I really like – such
as a conversation scene over a piano where the camera just glides and pans
towards each of the girls as they are talking, and it’s done so organically and
smoothly where our attention is being constantly diverted. Or with a shot of a
room which just seems to be imploding – with futons and pillow cases being
thrown all over the place, and it’s shot from below at an incredibly low angle
– through a pane of glass as the camera keeps rotating and it becomes more and
more disorientating.
One of the
recurring elements in the movie is with the spooky ambient main theme – which
is constantly played throughout the movie, funnily enough by the character
Melody, after she’s introduced to the piano room by her aunt – and it’s such an
ear-work where it just keeps playing and overturning all of these events. But,
the soundtrack is also really good – where it’s mostly predominantly composed
by the band Godiego who are usually great with everything, often very ambient
and spooky with somewhat of a jaunty quality to it – and I think the most
memorable song is “Cherries Were Made For Eating” which is just incredibly
joyful and vibrant, and everything else is somewhere between spooky and joyful.
Although, even the piano is eventually introduced to be an instrument of terror
later on in the movie – where Melody comments that the piano ‘bit her’ and
everything about the piano room just seems to be filled with more anxiety
and dread.
And yet, so
much of this movie is knowingly absurd – often times where it seems to break
the fourth wall repeatedly, and with so many different satirical tirades – as
well as portions of bizarre violence which are about as funny as they are
horrific, and it’s hard to really describe the general tone of this movie
because it’s so uniquely its own thing – and it operates on such a surrealist
abstract logic that it’s hard to really make any logical sense of the film and
yet it makes sense in the abstract. But, then again – the actual plot to the
movie is really simple and straight-forward – and I feel that upon rewatching
the film that it’s clear that they’ve actually explained what is happening and
why it happens by the end of the movie, but then the hard part comes with
trying to figure out what it all means – as so much of the movie feels
incredibly fractured and metaphorical, especially with the instances of
watermelons and cats which are somehow like ghostly and cursed apparitions in
this world.
And there’s a
tension that is derived from the fact where pretty much anything could happen
during their visit – and characters are either injured or killed off in ways
which are hard to describe with how surreal they are, where it ramps up
straight after a scene where a watermelon transforms into a flying severed head
which tries to eat one of the characters, and it goes even further once the
characters actually begin to realise what’s going on – like the whole world and
the whole movie is just collapsing in on them. It’s genuinely terrifying at
portions – and surprisingly so given that the first few moments of this film
are so goofy and innocent-looking, but then there’s an underlying eery and
spooky tension underpinning pretty much all of it – and there’s a lot of
portions that seem to play somewhat like a nostalgic montage of various photos
or videos of people who are going on holiday, and I think the success from the
horror relies on how it makes so many familiar and innocent seeming things just
taking on completely horrifying connotations and implications.
Which isn’t to
say that this movie is essentially a bunch of nonsense that’s put up on the
screen in order to provoke people just out of the sheer bizarreness of it, and
it’s actually really tightly written with how it introduces certain elements
that pay off later – with one of the main examples being the statement “Any cat
can open a door, but only a witch cat can close it.”, or with how the
watermelon farmer that they meet who shows them the house seems to be a bit off
when we first meet him – where it’s clear that he knew that the girls were
coming along the way. There’s a lot of strange and subtle hints that are placed
throughout the movie – and there’s very clearly a structure and a rhythm to the
mayhem even if it’s all incredibly surrealistic, and I think the movie is more
or less a commentary on childhood anxieties and fears and about the
increasingly rapid turmoil of time – and it’s clear as the movie develops that
the haunting of the house is an incredibly strange and grandiose metaphor for
this, and there’s a lot of moments in House which are strangely sad and
mournful in tone.
Although, it’s
the type of movie where I feel that it’s so surrealistic and abstract that
there’s so many different interpretations that could be made about it – and I
don’t think there’s any sort of words that can really do it justice. There’s
things in this movie which are so unbelievable and incredibly off the wall –
and it just seems to collateralise itself beyond comprehension to the point
where the images are moving much faster than we can really comprehend them, and
yet we’re constantly just wanting to figure out what is really going on with
this movie. The process of watching this movie feels like a completely
enigmatic and baffling mystery – and every subsequent viewing just feels like
I’m inching closer and closer to something that I can only ever really explain
to myself, and it went from a bizarre oddity into pretty much an obsession with
trying to figure out what this movie means and what Obayashi was really
intending with it – and interestingly so many of his other films also have a
similarly strange and eccentric tone and visual design which cover the two
critical themes of time and memory.
This is
definitely Obayashi’s masterpiece – something which is so incredibly
approachable with the visuals and with its bizarre sense of humour, and yet
there’s always something underneath the surface of it all which seems to amaze
me as much as it baffles me – and there is not a single film out there which is
like House, or at the very least there hasn’t been a single haunted house movie
just as bizarre and off-the-wall as House. It’s such a weirdly personal and
inventive piece of work that it just stands out as totally unique – and there’s
not a single frame in this movie which goes to waste.
Comments
Post a Comment